The Australian Registry, just like the records on file at NVDC, are the legal and current source for ownership and title decisions. The Australian Registry records were provided to the NVDC after they were certified and Apostille, but for whatever reason, the NVDC could not comprehend this simple fact. The Certified and Apostille Australian Registry records, the Australian Certificate of Deletion, and the Australian Bill of Sale had the full force of legality in the United States as a result of being Apostille, but the NVDC could not comprehend this. One can only assume, that this incorrect practice of using the Australian Registration Certificate as the basis for title decisions is also in effect for USCG Certificate of Documentation, even though both documents expressly denounce and prohibit this practice.
This NVDC rejection letter added another new request to be provided with paperwork showing the death of Mr. Jesson and transfer of sole ownership to Mrs. Jesson. I was extremely upset at this request as the NVDC had already been furnished with the certified and Apostille Australian Registry per 46 CFR 67.61 (b) requirements reflecting sole ownership to Mrs. Jesson, but they cold not comprehend or recognize that indisputable fact. However, I had no choice but to pursue the paperwork for this additional request.
Immediately sent email to AMSA Shipping Registration Office with a copy of the USCG rejection notice identifying the need for additional paperwork on transfer of ownership due to death of Mr. Jesson. In less than an hour had a response back. In the email the Australian SRO identified that they could not furnish the information requested due to Privacy Act concerns. This email was sent the same day to the USCG NVDC personnel with the Australian SRO cc'ed on the email in the hope that NVDC personnel could liaise with the Australian SRO and become educated on what documents they had already been furnished. I suspected this would not be the case as NVDC egos were involved and the Australian SRO email clearly emphasized they had provided correct, complete, and legal documents already.